Modified dispersive liquid-phase microextraction based on sequential injection solidified floating organic drop combined with HPLC for the determination of phenobarbital and phenytoin.

A modified dispersive liquid phase microextraction based on sequential injection solidified floating organic drop was developed for simultaneous separation/preconcentration of trace amounts of phenobarbital and phenytoin. The important factors affecting on the extraction recovery including pH, the volume of extraction solvent, ionic strength, and the number of injections were investigated and optimized by Box-Behnken design and desirability function. Under the optimum experimental conditions, the calibration graph was linear in the concentration range of 1.0-300.0 µg/L (r2  = 0.997) for phenobarbital and 2.0-400.0 µg/L (r2  = 0.996) for phenytoin. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were 0.35 and 1.2 µg/L for phenobarbital and 0.65 and 2.2 µg/L for phenytoin, respectively. The relative standard deviation for six replicate determinations at 10 µg/L was 3.3 and 4.1% for phenobarbital and phenytoin, respectively. The developed method was successfully applied to the determination of phenobarbital and phenytoin in urine and plasma samples.

A dilute-and-shoot flow-injection tandem mass spectrometry method for quantification of phenobarbital in urine.

RATIONALE: Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) is the gold standard of urine drug testing. However, current LC-based methods are time consuming, limiting the throughput of MS-based testing and increasing the cost. This is particularly problematic for quantification of drugs such as phenobarbital, which is often analyzed in a separate run because they must be negatively ionized. METHODS: This study examined the feasibility of using a dilute-and-shoot flow-injection method without LC separation to quantify drugs with phenobarbital as a model system. Briefly, a urine sample containing phenobarbital was first diluted by 10 times, followed by flow injection of the diluted sample to mass spectrometer. Quantification and detection of phenobarbital were achieved by an electrospray negative ionization MS/MS system operated in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode with the stable-isotope-labeled drug as internal standard. RESULTS: The dilute-and-shoot flow-injection method developed was linear with a dynamic range of 50-2000 ng/mL of phenobarbital and correlation coefficient > 0.9996. The coefficients of variation and relative errors for intra- and inter-assays at four quality control (QC) levels (50, 125, 445 and 1600 ng/mL) were 3.0% and 5.0%, respectively. The total run time to quantify one sample was 2 min, and the sensitivity and specificity of the method did not deteriorate even after 1200 consecutive injections. CONCLUSIONS: Our method can accurately and robustly quantify phenobarbital in urine without LC separation. Because of its 2 min run time, the method can process 720 samples per day. This feasibility study shows that the dilute-and-shoot flow-injection method can be a general way for fast analysis of drugs in urine. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Simultaneous extraction and quantification of lamotrigine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin in human plasma and urine samples using solidified floating organic drop microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography.

A novel and simple method based on solidified floating organic drop microextraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection has been developed for simultaneous preconcentration and determination of phenobarbital, lamotrigine, and phenytoin in human plasma and urine samples. Factors affecting microextraction efficiency such as the type and volume of the extraction solvent, sample pH, extraction time, stirring rate, extraction temperature, ionic strength, and sample volume were optimized. Under the optimum conditions (i.e. extraction solvent, 1-undecanol (40 µL); sample pH, 8.0; temperature, 25°C; stirring rate, 500 rpm; sample volume, 7 mL; potassium chloride concentration, 5% and extraction time, 50 min), the limits of detection for phenobarbital, lamotrigine, and phenytoin were 1.0, 0.1, and 0.3 µg/L, respectively. Also, the calibration curves for phenobarbital, lamotrigine, and phenytoin were linear in the concentration range of 2.0-300.0, 0.3-200.0, and 1.0-200.0 µg/L, respectively. The relative standard deviations for six replicate extractions and determinations of phenobarbital, lamotrigine, and phenytoin at 50 µg/L level were less than 4.6%. The method was successfully applied to determine phenobarbital, lamotrigine, and phenytoin in plasma and urine samples.

The ratio of 6ß-hydroxycortisol to cortisol in urine as a measure of cytochrome P450 3A activity in postmortem cases.

Poisoning can occur with chronic accumulation of a drug due to reduced metabolic capacity; conversely, under-treatment may occur due to an increased metabolic rate. Over half of all drugs are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 3A complex (CYP3A). The activity of CYP3A can be assessed by the urinary ratio of 6ß-hydroxycortisol to cortisol. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of this ratio as a postmortem marker for determining whether altered CYP3A enzyme activity occurred prior to death. In a series of 244 postmortem cases, this ratio ranged from 0.014 to 78.6 (median 3.50). The median was significantly higher (5.14) in a subgroup of 28 cases that exhibited the presence of CYP3A-inducing drugs. In cirrhosis, the median ratio was 1.69. This pointed to a reduced metabolic capacity of CYP3A. Thus, the ratio may constitute a rough indicator of the CYP3A metabolic capacity, which could be of value in special cases.

[Determination of phenobarbital in human urine and serum using flow injection chemiluminescence].

A sensitive chemiluminescence method, based on the enhancive effect of phenobarbital on the chemiluminescence reaction between luminol and dissolved oxygen in a flow injection system, was proposed for the determination of phenobarbital. The chemiluminescence intensity responded to the concentration of phenobarbital linearly ranging from 0.05 to 10 ng x ml(-1) with the detection limit of 0.02 ng x ml(-1) (3 sigma). At a flow rate of 2.0 ml x min(-1), a complete determination of phenobarbital, including sampling and washing, could be accomplished in 0.5 min, offering the sampling efficiency of 120 h(-1) accordingly. The method was applied successfully in an assay of PB for pharmaceutical preparations, human urine and serum without any pretreatment with recovery from 95.7 to 106.7% and RSDs of less than 3.0%.

Novel micro-extraction by packed sorbent procedure for the liquid chromatographic analysis of antiepileptic drugs in human plasma and urine.

A method for the simultaneous determination of the antiepileptic drugs, phenobarbital (PHB), phenytoin (PTN), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRM) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) in human plasma and urine samples by using micro-extraction in a packed syringe as the sample preparation method connected with LC/UV (MEPS/LC/UV) is described. Micro-extraction in a packed syringe (MEPS) is a new miniaturized, solid-phase extraction technique that can be connected online to gas or liquid chromatography without any modifications. In MEPS approximately 1 mg of the solid packing material is inserted into a syringe (100-250 µL) as a plug. Sample preparation takes place on the packed bed. The bed can be coated to provide selective and suitable sampling conditions. The new method is very promising, easy to use, fully automated, inexpensive and quick. The standard curves were obtained within the concentration range 1-500 ng/mL in both plasma and urine samples. The results showed high correlation coefficients (R(2) >0.988) for all of the analytes within the calibration range. The extraction recovery was found to be between 88.56 and 99.38%. The limit of quantification was found to be between 0.132 and 1.956 ng/mL. The precision (RSD) values of quality control samples (QC) had a maximum deviation of 4.9%. A comparison of the detection limits with similar methods indicates high sensitivity of the present method. The method is applied for the analysis of these drugs in real urine and plasma samples of epileptic patients.

Urine phenobarbital drug screening: potential use for compliance assessment in neonates.

This study was done to determine if urine phenobarbital measurements provide a reliable indicator of presence of the drug in neonates. Urine was collected from neonates treated with phenobarbital for clinical indications within 4 to 6 hours of clinically indicated collection of serum phenobarbital levels. Urine samples were also collected from control neonates not treated with phenobarbital. One aliquot was assayed fresh, another frozen at -30°C and assayed 1 to 3 months later. Phenobarbital was assayed using the ONLINE TDM Roche/Hitachi automated clinical chemistry analyzer. Serum and urine concentrations were compared as were fresh and frozen urine measurements. Serum phenobarbital ranged from 5.6 to 52.7 µg/mL. Matched urine samples were 56.6 ± 12.5% of the serum level. Frozen samples were 98.3 ± 8.0% of the fresh samples. Urine phenobarbital concentrations, either fresh or frozen, can be used in neonates as a noninvasive estimate of drug levels.

Sample stacking microemulsion electrokinetic capillary chromatography induced by reverse migrating pseudostationary phase for the quantification of phenobarbital and its p-hydroxyphenobarbital metabolite in rat urine.

For the first time, a capillary electrophoretic (CE) method with sample stacking induced by a reverse migrating pseudostationary phase (SRMP) technique has been developed and validated for sensitive determination of phenobarbital (PB) and its p-hydroxyphenobarbital (PHPB) metabolite in rat urine samples. Separation and determination were optimized on a fused-silica capillary with a total length of 50 cm (effective length 40 cm) and 75 µm ID. The microemulsion background electrolyte consisted of 0.8% (v/v) ethyl acetate, 6.6% (v/v) butan-2-ol, 1.0% (v/v) acetonitrile, 2.0% (w/v) sodium n-dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 89.6% (v/v) of 7.5 mM ammonium formate at pH 8. When this preconcentration technique was used, the sample stacking and the separation processes took place successively with changing the voltage with an intermediate polarity switching step. For practical application, a solid-phase extraction (SPE), C(18) sorbent with n-hexane/ethyl acetate (1 : 1%, v/v) as the elution solvent was used for sample purification and concentration. The SPE method gave good extraction yields for all the analytes, with absolute recovery values of 96.9% and 99.1% for PB and PHPB, respectively. The regression equations for PB and PHPB showed excellent linearity over a concentration range of 55-1386 ng mL(-1) for PB and PHPB (r = 0.998). The developed microemulsion electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEEKC) method for separation of the studied compounds with SRMP as the electrophoretic preconcentration technique allowed detection limits in urine samples at 16.8 ng mL(-1) for PB and PHPB which are 15-fold lower than the reported CE method in the literature. The precision results, expressed by the intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviation (RSD) values range from 3.6 to 7.1% (repeatability) and from 3.2 to 7.2% (intermediate precision) for PB and PHPB, respectively, which were in line with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria.

Barbiturate detection in oral fluid, plasma, and urine.

BACKGROUND: Although current abuse of barbiturates is low compared with other classes of abused drugs, their narrow margin of safety, risk of dependence, and abuse liability remain a health concern. Limited information is available on the disposition of barbiturates in different biologic matrices. OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a clinical study of the disposition of barbiturates in oral fluid, plasma, and urine after single-dose administration to healthy subjects. METHODS: Three parallel groups of 15 subjects were administered a single oral dose of one barbiturate: butalbital (50 mg), Phenobarbital (30 mg), or sodium secobarbital (100 mg). Subjects remained at the clinic for two confinement periods; the first was -1 to 36 hours postdose and again at 48 to 52 hours. Oral fluid specimens were collected by bilateral collection (Intercept; one on each side of the mouth simultaneously). Blood specimens were obtained by venipuncture and urine specimens were collected through separate collection pools of varying periods. Oral fluid specimens were analyzed for barbiturates by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy with a limit of quantitation of 8 ng/mL. Plasma and urine specimens were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy with a limit of quantitation of 100 ng/mL. RESULTS: Barbiturate side effects included dizziness, drowsiness, and somnolence. All effects resolved spontaneously without medical intervention. The three barbiturates were detectable in oral fluid and plasma within 15 to 60 minutes of administration and in the first urine pooled collection at 2 hours. Butalbital and Phenobarbital remained detectable in all specimens through 48 to 52 hours, whereas secobarbital was frequently negative in the last collection. Oral fluid to plasma ratios appeared stable over the 1- to 48-hour collection period. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that single, oral therapeutic doses of butalbital, Phenobarbital, and secobarbital were excreted in readily detectable concentrations in oral fluid over a period of approximately 2 days. Oral fluid patterns of appearance and elimination were similar to that observed for plasma and urine.

Quantitation of amobarbital, butalbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, and secobarbital in urine, serum, and plasma using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Barbiturates are central nervous system depressants with sedative and hypnotic properties. Some barbiturates, with longer half-lives, are used as anticonvulsants. Their mechanism of action includes activation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediated neuronal transmission inhibition. Clinically used barbiturates include amobarbital, butalbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, secobarbital, and thiopental. Besides their therapeutic use, barbiturates are commonly abused. Their analysis is useful for both clinical and forensic proposes. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry is a commonly used method for the analysis of barbiturates. In the method described here, barbiturates from serum, plasma, or urine are extracted using an acidic phosphate buffer and methylene chloride. Barbital is used as an internal standard. The organic extract is dried and reconstituted with mixture of trimethylanilinium hydroxide (TMAH) and ethylacetate. The extract is injected into a gas chromatogram mass spectrometer where it undergoes "flash methylation" in the hot injection port. Selective ion monitoring and relative retention times are used for the identification and quantitation of barbiturates.

False negative result for amphetamines on the Triage Drug of Abuse panel? The cause of the unusual phenomenon with experimental analyses.

On-site drug screening devices are widely used today for their simple test procedures and instantaneous results. Among other devices, a Triage Drug of Abuse panel is considered to be highly reliable for its high specificity and sensitivity of abused drugs. Although it is known that a false positive amphetamine (AMP) result may be obtained from the urine samples containing putrefactive amines or ephedrine-related compounds, no clinical false negative methamphetamine results have been reported to date. However, a false negative Triage result was obtained from the urine of a fatal methamphetamine poisoning victim taking Vegetamine tablets. Further experimental analyses revealed that the cross-reactivity of methamphetamine and chlorpromazine metabolites, including nor-2-chlorpromazine sulfoxide, was the cause for a false negative Triage reaction for AMP. Forensic scientists and clinicians must be aware of the limitations of on-site drug testing devices and the need for the confirmatory laboratory tests for the precise identification and quantification of drugs in suspicious intoxication cases, as also recommended by the manufacturers.

Effects of urine pH modification on pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital in healthy dogs.

Although pH modification is one of the effective strategies for dissolving or preventing uroliths, little is known about its effects on the pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital in dogs. Five spayed, female Beagles were fed with a twice-daily diet that included potassium citrate and ammonium chloride for urine alkalinization and acidification, respectively. After a stabilizing period of 7 days, a single clinical dose of phenobarbital (3 mg/kg) was orally administered, and time-course changes in its serum and urine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Total amounts of unchanged phenobarbital excreted into urine for 216 h were decreased by urine acidification and increased by urine alkalinization. The elimination half-life of serum phenobarbital in dogs with urine alkalinization was shortened and Cl(R) increased when compared with dogs with urine acidification. Other pharmacokinetic parameters, including C(max), T(max), AUC(0-216), Cl/F, and A(e0-216) were not changed by modification of the urine pH. These results suggest that the pH of urine is likely to be a determinant of the pharmacokinetics, especially urine excretion rate, of a clinical dose of oral phenobarbital. It is possible that the serum concentration of phenobarbital might be altered when a pH modifying-diet is administered for the purpose of dissolving or preventing uroliths.

Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: accelerating the characterization of discriminating signals by combining statistical correlations and ultrahigh resolution.

A strategy combining autocorrelation matrices and ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry (MS) was developed to optimize the characterization of discriminating ions highlighted by metabolomics. As an example, urine samples from rats treated with phenobarbital (PB) were analyzed by ultrahigh-pressure chromatography with two different eluting conditions coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection in both the positive and negative electrospray ionization modes. Multivariate data analyses were performed to highlight discriminating variables from several thousand detected signals: a few hundred signals were found to be affected by PB, whereas a few tenths of them were linked to its metabolism. Autocorrelation matrices were then applied to eliminate adduct and fragment ions. Finally, the characterization of the ions of interest was performed with ultrahigh-resolution mass spectrometry and sequential MS(n) experiments, by using a LC-LTQ-Orbitrap system. The use of different eluting conditions was shown to drastically impact on the chromatographic retention and ionization of compounds, thus providing a way to obtain more exhaustive metabolic fingerprints, whereas autocorrelation matrices allowed one to focus the identification work on the most relevant ions. By using such an approach, 14 PB metabolites were characterized in rat urines, some of which have not been reported in the literature.

Pharmacogenetic roles of CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 in the metabolism of R- and S-mephobarbital in humans.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We assessed the relationship between the metabolism of R- and S-mephobarbital (MPB) and genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 and CYP2B6. Nine homozygous extensive metabolizers (homo-EMs, 2C19*1/2C19*1) of CYP2C19, ten heterozygous EMs (hetero-EMs, 2C19*1/2C19*2, 2C19*1/2C19*3) and eleven poor metabolizers (PMs, 2C19*2/2C19*2, 2C19*3/2C19*3, 2C19*2/2C19*3) recruited from a Japanese population, received an oral 200 mg-dose of racemic MPB. Blood and urine samples were collected, and R-MPB, S-MPB and the metabolites, phenobarbital (PB) and 4'-hydroxy-MPB, were measured. Each subject was also genotyped for CYP2B6 gene. RESULTS: The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of R-MPB was 92-fold greater in PMs than in homo-EMs. R/S ratios for AUC of MPB were much higher in PMs than in EMs (homo- and hetero-). The cumulative urinary excretion of 4'-hydroxy-MPB up to 24 h postdose was 21-fold less in PMs than in homo-EMs. The metabolic ratio of AUCPB/(AUCS-MPB + AUCR-MPB) was higher in PMs than in EMs (homo- and hetero-). In addition, this metabolic ratio was lower in the carriers of CYP2B6*6 compared with that in its non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the 4'-hydroxylation of R-MPB is mediated via CYP2C19 and that the rapid 4'-hydroxylation of R-MPB results in a marked difference in the pharmacokinetic profiles between R-MPB and S-MPB in the different CYP2C19 genotypic individuals. In addition, a minor fraction of the interindividual variability in PB formation from MPB may be explainable by the CYP2B6*6 allele.

Preparation and usage of a new solid phase micro-extraction membrane.

Liquid-liquid or solid phase extraction methods are widely used for isolating analytes from urine, blood and other samples. But the preparation procedures of the samples are laborious, intensive, and costly. In addition, the organic solvents used are toxic to both the human body and the environment. An accurate, simple and rapid method for analysis of some compounds is required for forensic, judicial, and clinical purposes. Solid phase micro-extraction membrane (SPMEM) is a new, simple and solventless preparation technique. It integrates sampling, extraction and concentration into a single step and has the advantages of both the solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) and membrane separation. In this paper, a new kind of membrane used for the solid phase micro-extraction was prepared with amide compounds. The extraction conditions such as adsorption time, desorption solvents, methods and time are studied and optimized. The dichlorvos in the blood, morphine and phenobarbital in the urine were perfectly separated by using this solid phase micro-extraction membrane, and were tested by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). All the data were acquired in scan mode except that of morphine which was obtained in a selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Ions used for identification were those with m/z 57, 115, 162, 215, 285.

An amobarbital molecularly imprinted microsphere for selective solid-phase extraction of phenobarbital from human urine and medicines and their determination by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A 40-60 microm amobarbital molecularly imprinted microsphere, used as a solid-phase selective sorbent for extracting phenobarbital from human urine and medicines, was prepared by a suspension polymerization method. A series of binding studies was performed in order to find optimal loading, washing and eluting conditions for solid-phase extraction. Under optimal conditions, good recoveries of phenobarbital in samples were obtained. Normally, molecularly imprinted polymers, prepared in bulk, require laborious work. Significant losses occur during the procedure of grinding and washing. In this work all molecularly imprinted polymers made into microsphere could be utilized, and the cost of the template was reduced too (the price of phenobarbital is twice that of amobarbital). As the phenobarbital to be extracted was different from the template molecule amobarbital, the interference caused by template leaking could be avoided in the assay.

P-hydroxylation of phenobarbital: relationship to (S)-mephenytoin hydroxylation (CYP2C19) polymorphism.

The aim of the current study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of phenobarbital (PB) in extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) of S-mephenytoin. Ten healthy volunteers (5 EMs and 5 PMs) were given 30 mg PB daily for 14 days. PB and p-hydroxyphenobarbital (p-OHPB) in serum and urine were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Urinary excretion (12.5% versus 7.7%) and formation clearance (29.8 versus 21.1 mL/h) of p-OHPB, one of the main metabolites of PB, were significantly lower (p < .05) in PMs than in EMs. However, area under the serum concentration-time curve (153.3 in the EMs versus 122.9 microg x h/mL in the PMs), total (210.8 versus 254.9 mL/h) and renal clearance (53.1 versus 66.1 mL/h) of PB were identical between the two groups. To compare the inducibility of CYP2C19, mephenytoin was also given prior to and on the last day of PB treatment. The urinary level of 4'-hydroxymephenytoin was analyzed by a validated gas chromatograpy/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method. The mephenytoin hydroxylation index did not change in either EMs (1.42 versus 1.42) or PMs (341.4 versus 403.5), showing that CYP2C19 was not induced by treatment with PB. These results indicated that the p-hydroxylation pathway of PB co-segregates with the CYP2C19 metabolic polymorphism. However, the overall disposition kinetics of PB were not different between EMs and PMs, and therefore polymorphic CYP2C19 seems have no major clinical implications.

Effects of encapsulation of primidone on its oxidative metabolism in rats.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of primidone (PRM) nanoencapsulation on its metabolism. Suspensions of PRM powder and PRM-loaded poly-epsilon-caprolactone nanocapsules were administered orally in the same way to rats. Primidone-loaded poly-epsilon-caprolactone nanocapsules were prepared according to the interfacial deposition technique. Free PRM suspensions were obtained by addition of PRM powder to a suspension of 0.212% carboxymethylcellulose CMC 12H in water. The dose was 20 mg/kg, n = 6, for each experiment. Urinary and faecal levels of PRM and of its three major metabolites, phenylethylmalonamide (PEMA), phenobarbital (PB), and p-hydroxyphenobarbital (p-HO-PB), were determined. Concentrations were evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) according to a validated analytical method. After PRM nanocapsule administration, non-metabolised PRM urinary levels were increased compared to those observed after administration of a suspension of primidone powder (43.7+/-8.8% after PRM-loaded nanocapsule and 37.7+/-8.1% after free PRM administration). For phenylethylmalonamide, no difference was observed in urinary excretion in the two cases. For two of the oxidised metabolites, PB and p-HO-PB, excretion was delayed and shortened. The amount of these oxidised metabolites was lowered from 0.95% after free PRM administration to 0.25% after PRM-loaded nanocapsule administration. No difference was noted in non-metabolised primidone excretion in faeces. These results suggest that primidone-loaded nanocapsules could be used as a vehicle for oral primidone administration in order to minimise the phenobarbital metabolic pathway.

Identification of the general unknown. Application of mass selective detectors in forensic toxicology.

One of the basic aims of forensic toxicology is the identification of previously unknown drugs and poisons. This is frequently achieved using the combination of gas chromatography and benchtop quadrupole or ion trap mass spectrometers. The influence of matrix loading on the mass spectral quality was tested, and it was found that a realistic amount of matrix changed the pattern of the spectra obtained by the ion trap mass spectrometer. Disturbed mass spectra led to unsuitable suggestions from the library search and thus rendered the identification of the "general unknown" more difficult. On the other hand, higher selectivity and lower detection limits favored the ion trap technology for target analysis because of the capability of MS-MS.

Urinary excretion of phenobarbital and its metabolite p-hydroxyphenobarbital in convulsing and non-convulsing patients.

As part of an investigation of phenobarbital (PB) pharmacokinetics in patients with status epilepticus (SE), urinary excretion of PB and its main metabolite, hydroxyphenobarbital (HPB), was studied in patients who had an episode of SE, as well as in non-convulsing ones. Eleven in-patients were studied:(group 1) five patients (4 M + 1 F; 48 +/- 28 years old; 64 +/- 6 kg body weight; mean +/- SD) with convulsive status epilepticus, and (group 2) six patients (5 M + 1 F; 37 +/- 13 years old; 71 +/- 15 kg body weight) with epilepsy, seizure-free at the moment of PB administration and without established anti-epileptic therapy. All subjects received a single intravenous dose of PB (15 mg/kg) at a rate of 100 mg/min. PB and HPB concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection at 220 nm in urine samples collected throughout 24 h. The comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters of urinary excretion of PB and HPB showed a statistically significant difference in the values of recovery of HPB and total barbiturate (higher values in the patients with SE) in 24 h urine. Differences in the excretion of PB between the two groups of patients--higher values in the patients who had had an episode of SE, and in urine flow--slightly elevated volumes in the same group, failed to reach statistical significance, probably due to the small number of participants in the study.